Revisión teórica acerca del conocimiento geográfico potente. Un nuevo enfoque conceptual en la Educación Geográfica
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Esta revisión teórica busca dar cuenta del análisis realizado sobre la discusión de la literatura que sustenta el enfoque conceptual identificado en su idioma original como “Powerful Knowledge Geography”, el cual aquí se trabaja como Conocimiento Geográfico Potente (CGP) para reconocer el nivel de desarrollo de dicho planteamiento y analizar su pertinencia en la educación geográfica. Se encontraron diversas posturas sobre lo que puede significar el CGP y un punto de encuentro en el que su enseñanza debe ser a través de un proceso de recontextualización, como parte de la reivindicación al acceso democrático de este conocimiento y como derecho de justicia social para los estudiantes. La indagación se realizó a partir de una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura publicada en diversas bases de datos entre los años 2007 y 2021. Se analizaron 80 resultados considerados pertinentes que dan cuenta del acervo teórico del tema. Este artículo refiere los aportes correspondientes al CGP, con respecto a su base teórica, el Conocimiento Poderoso (CP), para profundizar en la discusión de los trabajos que analizan el nivel de desarrollo de este enfoque. La investigación permite reconocer las fortalezas y áreas de oportunidad que este planteamiento aporta a la educación geográfica.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Citas
Béneker, T. (2018). Powerful knowledge in geography education. Inaugural lecture. Utrecht University.
Béneker, T., y Van der Vaart, R. (2020). The knowledge curve: Combining types of knowledges leads to powerful thinking. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 221-231.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. (Vol. 5) Rowman & Littlefield.
Biddulph, M., Bèneker, T., Mitchell, D., Hanus, M., Leininger-Frézal, C., Zwartjes, L., y Donert, K. (2020). Teaching powerful geographical knowledge–a matter of social justice: initial findings from the GeoCapabilities 3 project. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 260-274
.
Bouwmans, M., y Béneker, T. (2018). Identifying Powerful Geographical Knowledge in Integrated Curricula in Dutch Schools. London Review of Education, 16(3), 445-459.
Callai, H., y de Moraes, M. (2017). Educação geográfica, cidadania e cidade. Acta Geográfica, Edição Especial, 82-100.
Catling, S., y Martin, F. (2011). Contesting powerful knowledge: the primary geography curriculum as an articulation between academic and children's (ethno-) geographies. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 317-335.
Derry, J. (2017). What is educationally worthwhile knowledge? Revisiting the case for powerful knowledge. En Sociology, Curriculum Studies and Professional Knowledge. (pp.84-96). Routledge.
Firth, R. (2011). Debates about knowledge and the curriculum: Some implications for geography education. En G. Butt (Eds.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 141-164). Bloomsbury.
Galian, C., y Louzano, P. (2014). Michael Young e o campo do currículo: da ênfase no "conhecimento dos poderosos" à defesa do"conhecimento poderoso". Educação e Pesquisa, 40(4), 1109-1124.
Galian, C., y Stefenon, D.. (2018). Por que é tão difícil definer o conhecimento a ser ensinado na escola? Um olhar para a Geografia. Educação e Filosofia, Uberlândia, 32(64), 59-90.
Huckle, J. (2019). Powerful geographical knowledge is critical knowledge underpinned by critical realism. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 70-84
Krause, U., Béneker, T., y van Tartwijk, J. (2021R). Geography textbook tasks fostering thinking skills for the acquisition of powerful knowledge. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31(1), 69-83.
Lambert, D., Solem, M., y Tani, S. (2015). Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 723-735.
Lambert, D. (2019). On the knotty question of ‘Recontextualising’geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(4), 257-261.
Larsen, T. B., Solem, M., Zadrozny, J., y Boehm, R. G. (2021). Contextualizing powerful geographic knowledge in higher education: Data-driven curriculum design to interweave student aspirations with workforce applications. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31 (2) 1-14.
Maton, K. (2014). Building powerful knowledge: The significance of semantic waves. In Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum (pp. 181-197). Palgrave Macmillan.
Maude, A. (2013). The vision of geography underlying the Australian geography curriculum. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 3(3).
Maude, A. (2015). What is powerful knowledge and can it be found in the Australian geography curriculum?. Geographical Education (Online), 28, 18-26.
Maude, A. (2016). What might powerful geographical knowledge look like?. Geography, 101(2), 70-76.
Maude, A. (2017). Applying the concept of powerful knowledge to school geography. In The power of geographical thinking (pp. 27-40). Springer.
Maude, A. (2018). Geography and powerful knowledge: A contribution to the debate. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(2), 179-190.
Maude, A., y Caldis, S. (2019). Teaching higher-order thinking and powerful geographical knowledge through the Stage 5 Biomes and Food Security unit. Geographical Education (Online), 32, 30-39.
Maude, A. (2020). The role of geography’s concepts and powerful knowledge in a future 3 curriculum. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 232-243.
Muller, J., y Young, M. (2019). Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196-214.
Roberts, M. (2014). Powerful knowledge and geographical education. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 187-209.
Rodrigues, R. (2020). O poder do conhecimento geográfico no enfrentamento dos desafios da formação para a cidadania ativa no Brasil. Didácticas Específicas, 22, 59-70.
Slater, F., Graves, N. y Lambert, D. (2016). Editorial. Geography as powerful knowledge. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(3), 189-194, DOI: 10.1080/10382046.2016.1155321
Solem, M., Lambert, D., y Tani, S.. (2013). Geocapabilities: Toward an international framework for researching the purposes and values of geography education. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 3(3), 214-229.
Stolman, J., Lidstone, J., y Kidman, G. (2015). Powerful knowledge in geography: IRGEE editors interview professor David Lambert, London Institute of Education, October 2014. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 1-5.
Tani, S., Cantell, H., y Hilander, M. (2018). Powerful disciplinary knowledge and the status of geography in Finnish upper secondary schools: Teachers’ views on recent changes. J-Reading: Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography, 1, 5-16.
Uhlenwinkel, A., Béneker, T., Bladh, G., Tani, S., y Lambert, D. (2016). GeoCapabilities and curriculum leadership: balancing the priorities of aim-based and knowledge-led curriculum thinking in schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4), 327-341.
Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K.,y& Rusanen, J. (2019). Powerful knowledge and the significance of teaching geography for in-service upper secondary teachers–a case study from Northern Finland. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(2), 103-117.
Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency‐based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637-651.
Whittall, D. (2019). Learning powerful knowledge successfully: Perspectives from sixth form geography students. Impact: Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching Issue, 5.
Young, M. F. (1972). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 20(2).
Young, M. (2008). From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of research in education, 32(1), 1-28.
Young, M. (2013a). Powerful knowledge: An analytically useful concept or just a ‘sexy sounding term’? A response to John Beck’s ‘Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 195-198.
Young, M. (2013b). Disciplina versus habilidades, un análisis sociológico. En Adolfo Stubrin y Natalia Díaz (Eds.), Tensiones entre disciplinas y competencias en el currículo universitario (pp. 30-46). Ediciones UNL.
Young, M. F. (2016). ¿Por qué o conhecimento é importante para as escolas do século XXI?. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 46, 18-37.
Young, M., y Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European journal of education, 45(1), 11-27.
Young, M., y Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of education, 1(3), 229-250.